Journal of Literary Criticism

Journal of Literary Criticism

Semiotic analysis of the image and its narration in the dual identity of paintings in the book Fatahnameh (British Museum version) using Derrida deconstruction theory

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
shahryar shokrpour 1
fariba azhari 2
1 Tabriz University of Islamic Arts
2 Tabriz Islamic art university
10.22034/jlc.2021.133819
Abstract
the book of Fatahnameh is a place where two different cultures and religions meet. This book provides an opportunity to discuss how signs and their meanings relate to each other in image. It seems that some of the visual cues used in the works along with the historical narrative are important in determining to identity of the paintings. In this research, an attempt is made to study and analyze the paintings of the book of Fatahnameh being kept in the British Museum's with a semiotic approach by descriptive-analytical method and Collecting data and studying the library resources. In this regard, using Derrida's deconstruction strategy in reading and analyzing the drawings in question to understand the dual identity of the book was considered as possible way, and due to the low luck of researchers in this regard, it necessitates doing research on it. The aim, is to achieve making sense of the dual identity of the drawings in the book of Fatahnameh and the connection of the drawings of this book with the pictorial property of Safavid period painting. The factor or factors that lead to the production of dual identity in this work is a question that is answered through the present research. Based on the findings of the study, Pargon, narrative, visual cues, and texture are the four factors that produce a dual identity in the work, and the role of Pargon and narrative is the most colorful.
Keywords
image
narrative
identity
Fatahnameh
deconstruction of Derrida
آفرین، فریده (۱۳۹۰). «چالش ساختار و معنا: خوانش واساز از نگارۀ بیرون آوردن یوسف از چاه». باغ نظر. س ۸. ش 16. صص ۶۴-۵۵. ##ابدالی، فرهاد و امیرعلی نجومیان (۱۳۹۲). «خودواسازیِ تقابل دوگانه حافظ/ زاهد در غزلیات حافظ، خوانشی دریدایی». فصلنامۀ پژوهش‌های ادبی. س ۱۰. ش 41. صص 9ـ30. ##ذکاء، یحیی (1344). «تاریخچۀ تغییرات و تحولات درفش و علامت دولت ایران از آغاز سدۀ سیزدهم هجری قمری تا امروز». هنر و مردم. ش 31. صص 13ـ24. ##شکرپور، شهریار و فریبا ازهری (۱۳۹۸). «نقش فیگور در روایت‌شناسی آثار نگارگری بررسی موردی شش نگاره از شاهنامۀ طهماسبی». نامۀ هنرهای تجسمی و کاربردی. س ۱۲. ش 25. صص 101ـ121. ##جهانگیری، جهانگیر و علی بندرریگی‌زاده (۱۳۹۲). «قانون، عدالت و مسئولیت در فلسفۀ ژاک دریدا». متافیزیک. س ۵. ش 16. صص 35ـ50. ##شیبانی رضوانی، فیروزه (۱۳۹۲). «بررسی مفهوم تصمیم‌ناپذیری از منظر دریدا: خوانشی از آثار نقاشی علیرضا اسپهبد». فصلنامۀ کیمیای هنر. س ۲. ش 9. صص 53ـ64. ##شیبانی رضوانی، فیروزه (۱۳۹۷). «واسازی روایت، خوانشی از نقاشی‌های هانیبال الخاص». پژوهش‌نامۀ فرهنگستان هنر. س ۲. ش 1. صص 27ـ44. ##کوین مالکوم، ریچاردز (۱۳۹۹). واسازی دریدا و هنرهای بصری. ترجمۀ فریده آفرین. تهران: مهر نوروز. ##لوی، حبیب (۱۹۶۰). تاریخ یهود ایران. ج 3. تهران: بروخیم. ##موسوی‌لر، اشرف‌السادات و صدف پور‌محمود (۱۳۹۷). نظریۀ تقابل دریدا در هنرهای تجسمی. تهران: مهر نوروز. ##مهدی‌زاده، علیرضا (1۳۹۵). «تحلیل و خوانش عکس بر مبنای ابزارهای تحلیلی رویکرد نشانه‌شناسی». پژوهش هنر. س 6. ش 12. صص 75ـ90. ##نتضر، آمنون (۱۳۵۲). منتخب اشعار فارسی از آثار یهودیان ایران. تهران: فرهنگ ایران‌زمین. ##Abdali, F., & Nojomian, A. (2013). “Self-construction of Hafez / Zahid dual confrontation in Hafez's lyric poems, Derridae reading” (in Farsi). Journal of Literary Research. Vol. 10. No. 4. pp. 9-30. ##Afarin, F. (2011). “The Structure and Meaning Challenge: A Deconstructive Reading of Getting Joseph Out of the Well” (in Farsi). Bagh nazar. Vol. 8. No. 16. pp. 55-64. ##Jacques. D. (1981). Dissemination. published by arranngment with the university of Chicago. translated by Johnson. Barbara. ##Jacques. D. (1987). The truth in painting. Printed in the United States of America. The University of Chicago. ##Jahangiri, J., & Bandar Rigizadeh, A. (2013). “Law, Justice and Responsibility in the Philosophy of Jacques Derrida” (in Farsi). Metaphysics. Vol. 5. No. 16. pp 35-50. ##Kevin Malcolm, R. (2021). Derrida Deconstruction and Visual Arts (in Farsi). Farideh Afarin (Tr.). Tehran: Mehr Nowruz. ##Levy, H. (1960). Jewish History of Iran (in Farsi). Vol. 3. Tehran: Brokhim.##M.Balkin, J. (1996). “Yale law school”. 1-11. ##Moreen, V. B. (1995). “A Supplementary list of Judaea-Persian Manuscripts”. 71- 80. ##Mousavi, A., & Poor Mahmoud, S. (2018). Derrida Theory of Confrontation in Visual Arts (in Farsi). Tehran: Mehr Nowruz. ##Netzar, A. (1974). Selected Persian poems from the works of Iranian Jews (in Farsi). Tehran: Farhang Iran Zamin Publications. ##Selden, R., & Widdowson, P., & Brooker, P. (2005). A Reeader's Guide to contemporary Literary Theory. printed in Malysia. ##Shakarpour, S., & Azhari, F. (2020). “The Role of Figures in the Narrative of Paintings: A Case Study of Six Paintings from Tahmasebi Shahnameh” (in Farsi). Letter of Visual and Applied Arts. Vol. 12. No. 25. pp. 101-121. ##Sheibani Rezvani, F. (2013). “Study of the concept of indecision from Derrida's point of view: a reading of Alireza Espahbod's paintings” (in Farsi). Quarterly Journal of Art Chemistry. Vol. 2. No. 9. pp. 53-64. ##Skempton, S. (2012). “Universality and the deconstraction of identity”. National Research University – Higher School of Economics. Moscow. ##Taylor, A. (1995). Book art of Isfahan discovery and identity in seventeenth- century Persia. published on the occasion of an exhibition at the j.paul Getty museum.Torah. Jashua. Genesis. ##W.Gooding, D. (2016). The Book of Joshua. Published by The Myrtlefield Trust. ##www.7dorm.com, access date: 2020/10/4. ##www.Bl.uk, access date: 2020/10/22. ##www.blogs.bl.uk, access date: 2020/09/15. ##www.kibbutzvisit.com, access date: 2021/02/01. ##www.lib.eshia.ir, access date: 2020/11/9. ##Zaka, Y. (1966). “History of changes and developments of the flag and emblem of the Iranian government from the beginning of the thirteenth century AH until today” (in Farsi). Art and people. No. 31. pp. 13-24. ##
Journal of Literary Criticism
Volume 6, Issue 11
March 2022
Pages 285-249

  • Receive Date 09 February 2021
  • Revise Date 25 April 2021
  • Accept Date 17 May 2021