Journal of Literary Criticism

Journal of Literary Criticism

An analysis of disnarration and its semiotic challenges in Shazde Ehtejab

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Nazanin Tahernejad 1
Hamidreza Shairi 2
Maryam Iraji 3
1 English department .Azad university. Tehran central branch. Tehran.Iran
2 Professor, Department of French Language, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Foreign Languages, Islamic Azad University Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
10.22034/jlc.2022.342053.1475
Abstract
Narrative is an action-oriented structure defined on the basis of a linear system based on material imperfection. The main purpose of such a narrative is to show the acquisition of value based on the movement of agents. However, with the advent of the post-Greimas period in the Paris school, we come to a new aspect of the narrative in which events are not in their original place and therefore cause anxiety, anomaly and mental confusion of agents and readers. It is in this context that the narrative overlaps and, by shifting the elements of action, time and place, the narrative leaves its strong structures. Accordingly, a new era of narrative begins, which we call the post-action and post-deterministic period: these shifts and narrative interactions occur in the heart of the narrative cause disnarrative. Disnarrative leads to encountering a kind of intervention and movement of elements or a kind of surprise in which the narrative is no longer a function of phases and process stages based on the classical pattern. The main question we face is how disnarrative disrupts the narrative process and changes it from a fixed and coded state to an indefinite and turbulent state? According to the post-action approach, the main issue of the article is to see how disnarrative changes the conditions of meaning production. The main purpose of this paper is to study the process of disnarrative with emphasis on elements such as anti-action, anachrony, displacement and dissemantic by focusing on the story of “Shazdeh Ehtejab”.
Keywords
Disnarration
Narrative interference
Displacement
Anachrony
Dis-action
بابک‌معین، مرتضی‌ (1396). ابعاد گمشدۀ معنا در نشانه‌شناسی روایی کلاسیک. نظام معنایی تطبیق یا رقص در تعامل. تهران: علمی و فرهنگی.## حسن‌لی، کاووس و زیبا قلاوندی (1388). «بررسی تکنیک‌های روایی در رمان شازده‌احتجاب هوشنگ گلشیری». ادب‌پژوهی. پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی. ش 78. صص 7ـ25.## دزفولیان، کاظم و فؤاد مولودی (1389). «بررسی و تحلیل دو مؤلفۀ صدای راوی و کانونی‌شدگی در شازده‌احتجاب». دوفصلنامۀ زبان و ادبیات فارسی. ش 69. صص 7ـ28.## سیدان، مریم (1387). «تحلیل و بررسی شازده‌احتجاب گلشیری با دیدگاه ساخت‌گرایانه». فصلنامۀ نقد ادبی. ش 4. صص 7ـ11.## شعیری، حمیدرضا (1388). «از نشانه‌شناسی ساخت‌گرا تا نشانه‌معناشناسی گفتمانی». فصلنامۀ نقد ادبی، ش 8. صص 33ـ51.## شعیری، حمیدرضا (1395). نشانه معناشناسی ادبیات. تهران: مرکز نشر آثار علمی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس.## شعیری، حمیدرضا و فهیمه حیدری (1398). «ترسیم نشانه ـ جغرافیایی گفتمان رند در اشعار حافظ». مجلۀ حافظ‌پژوهی. س 22. ش 22 (دورۀ جدید، ش 1). صص 73ـ92.## قویمی، مهوش (1387). «بوف کور و شازد‌ احتجاب: دو رمان سوررئالیست». پژوهشنامۀ علوم انسانی. ش 57. صص 317ـ334.## گلشیری، هوشنگ (1384). شازده‌احتجاب. چ 14. تهران: نیلوفر.## Bakhtine, M. (1970). La poétique du Dostoïevski. Paris: Seuil.## Babak Moin, M. (2016). The missing dimensions of meaning in classical narrative semioticsSemantic system of adaptation or dance in interaction (in Farsi). Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications.## Benveniste, E. (1966). Problème de linguistique générale, t.1. Paris: Gallimard.## Bertrand, D. (2000). Précis de sémiotique littéraire. Paris: Nathan.## Bertrand, D. (2011). Une sémiotique du sujet. Acte du colloque en hommage à Ivan Darrault-Harris, présenté par Didier Tsala Effa. Limoges: Lambert-Lucas.## Coquet, J-C. (1984). Le Discours et son sujet. Paris: Klincksieck.## Geninasca, J. (1997). La parole littéraire. Paris : PUF.## Greimas, A. J. (1983). Du sens II. Essais sémiotiques. Paris: Seuil.## Gulshiri, H. (2005). Shazdeh Ehtjab (in Farsi). 14th Ed. Tehran: Nilofar Publications.## Hasanli, K., & Qalavandi, Z. (2009). “Examination of Narrative Techniques in Hoshang Golshiri's novel Shazdeh Ehtjab” (in Farsi). Literature Research. Humanities Research Institute. No. 78. pp. 7-25.## Qoimi, M. (2007). “The blind owl and the secretive prince: two surrealist novels"”. Journal of humanities. No. 57. pp. 317-334.## Shairi, H. R., & Heydari, F. (2018). “Describing the symbolic-geographical discourse of Rand in Hafez's poems” (in Farsi). Hafez Pazhuhi Magazine.Vol. 22. No. 22. pp. 73-92.## Shairi, H. R. (2009). “From Constructivist Semiotics to Discourse Semiotics” (in Farsi). Specialized Quarterly of Literary Criticism. No. 8. pp. 51-33.## Shairi, H. R. (2015). Semantic sign of literature (in Farsi). Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University Scientific Works Publishing Center.## Sidan, M. (2007). “Analysis and investigation of Golshiri's Shazdeh Ehtajab with a constructivist perspective” (in Farsi). Literary Criticism Magazine. No. 4. pp. 7-11.##
Journal of Literary Criticism
Volume 6, Issue 12
September 2022
Pages 364-337

  • Receive Date 14 May 2022
  • Revise Date 01 October 2022
  • Accept Date 02 October 2022