Journal of Literary Criticism

Journal of Literary Criticism

Examining its levels and elements in the narrative plan of Hazrat Ali Akbar's Ta'ziyya

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 PhD in Philosophy of Art Department of Philosophy of Art, Faculty of Art, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor Department of Art, Islamic Azad University, Yazd Branch, Yazd, Iran
3 Associate Professor Department of Directing and Acting, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
4 Associate Professor Department of Western Philosophy, Faculty of Literature, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
5 Assistant Professor Department of Performing Arts, in Philosophy of Art, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
10.22034/jlc.2025.489148.1691
Abstract
Narrative is commonly defined as a transition from a state of equilibrium to disequilibrium and ultimately to a secondary equilibrium. The Ta'ziyeh of Hazrat Ali Akbar similarly begins with a preliminary recitation in a balanced state, which is disrupted by the presence of antagonistic forces, leading ultimately to the martyrdom of Hazrat Ali Akbar. This performance, typically staged on the eighth day of Muharram, portrays key moments including the request for permission to enter the battlefield, combat, return, request for water, and martyrdom, culminating in a collective ritual procession.
This study aims to examine the narrative structure of the Ta'ziyeh of Hazrat Ali Akbar through a narratological approach. While identifying a unified model is not feasible due to variations in performance, shared structural features can be identified and analyzed. The findings indicate that the narrative structure of Ta'ziyeh can be divided into three main parts: introduction, main event, and conclusion. The introduction prepares the audience through musical and vocal elements; the main event develops around the fate of the central character; and the conclusion culminates in martyrdom and ritual participation.
The analysis further reveals that the narrative structure consists of multiple interwoven levels, frequent disruptions in narrative continuity, and the strategic arrangement of motifs. Temporal progression is largely linear, with limited instances of anachrony. The narrator employs omission and condensation to regulate narrative speed, focusing on key turning points. Emphasis is placed on the events of Ashura as a present experiential time, rather than a historical past. Additionally, the interplay between auditory and visual elements plays a crucial role in shaping narrative levels and audience experience, resulting in a multi-layered performative space.
Keywords
Subjects

Akhavat, A. (1992). The grammar of story. Farda. Armer, A. (2004). Screenwriting for cinema and television (A. Akbari, Trans.). Soureh Mehr. Barthes, R. (2008). Introduction to the structural analysis of narratives (M. Ragheb, Trans.). Farhang-e Saba. Berger, A. (2008). Narrative in popular culture (M. Liravi, Trans.). Soroush. Bertens, H. (2005). Literary theory: The basics (M. Abolghasemi, Trans.). Mahi. Biniyaz, F. (2008). Introduction to fiction writing and narratology. Afraz. Chatman, S. (2011). Story and discourse (R. Mirkhandan, Trans.). Seda va Sima. Culler, J. (2003). Literary theory (F. Taheri, Trans.). Markaz. Dad, S. (2004). Dictionary of literary terms (2nd ed.). Morvarid. Dehkhoda, A. (1998). Dictionary. Soroush. Eagleton, T. (2001). Literary theory: An introduction (A. Mokhber, Trans.). Markaz. Ghasemi Pour, G. (2008). Time and narrative. Journal of Literary Criticism, (2). Golabass, F. (2015). Directing the story (D. Norouzi, Trans.). Farabi. Green, W., Reisman, J., Lieber, L., Morgan, L., & Willingham, J. (2004). Foundations of literary criticism (F. Taheri, Trans.; 3rd ed.). Nilufar. Hari, A. (2008). Point of view versus focalization. Journal of Fiction Literature, (105). Hari, A. (2009). Time and space in Qur’anic narratives. Research in Persian Language and Literature, (15). Martin, W. (2007). Narrative theories (M. Shahba, Trans.). Hermes. McKee, R. (2014). Story (M. Gozarabadi, Trans.). Hermes. McQuillan, M. (2009). Selected essays on narrative (M. Fattah, Trans.). Minu-ye Kherad. Mirsadeghi, J. (2001). Elements of fiction (3rd ed.). Sokhan. Parvini, Kh. (2008). Propp’s structural model and its applications in narratology. Quarterly Journal of Persian Language and Literature, (11). Perrine, L. (2008). On story (M. Soleimani, Trans.). Hozeh Honari. Prince, G. (2012). Narratology (M. Shahba, Trans.). Minu-ye Kherad. Ricoeur, P. (2004). Life in the world of the text (B. Ahmadi, Trans.). Markaz. Rimmon-Kenan, S. (2008). Narrative fiction: Contemporary poetics (A. Hari, Trans.). Nilufar. Ryan, M.-L., & Alphen, E. (2009). Encyclopedia of contemporary literary theory (M. Nabavi & M. Nabavi, Trans.). Agah. Saeidian, A. (1984). Encyclopedia of literature. Amir Kabir. Scholes, R. (2004). Structuralism in literature (F. Taheri, Trans.). Agah. Shahba, M. (2014). Narrative elements in television series. Seda va Sima Journal. Tadie, J. Y. (1999). Literary criticism in the twentieth century (M. Nonehali, Trans.). Nilufar. Todorov, T. (2002). Narrative and anti-narrative (M. Ebrahimi, Trans.). Farabi. Toolan, M. J. (2004). A critical linguistic introduction to narrative (A. Hari, Trans.). Bonyad-e Farabi. Webster, R. (2004). Narrative and language. Journal of Fiction Literature. Yousefzadeh, G. (2013). Narrative levels in Qur’anic stories. Seda va Sima.
Volume 10, Issue 19
April 2026
Pages 582-537

  • Receive Date 22 November 2024
  • Revise Date 09 February 2025
  • Accept Date 04 March 2025